Dimentions

[update: 8/23/2023 (I tried to recover the date of this post, but wanted to note I could not figure out when I originally posted it.  As for the label, I probably planned to add more but wanted to have this near the beginning for some reason.  I can't promise to carry-on with the same intent but I am reviewing the work.  One reason might be to organize the topics or labels over-all.)

TED talk(~)deconstructed ? [!] ;;;


1.  cognitive/rational
2.  intuitive?
3.  practical
4.  ethical
5.  aesthetic [!]
6.  adaptive
7.  time sensitive
8.  balanced

Not necessarily dimensions.


(fp!)
Supreme Court Jest Ice?

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO APRIL 2014

FOOTNOTES PAGE DECEMBER 2013
HiTetra!


[~...~] b. C#PO(correction) C3PO , c. Ouroboros , d. Walking the Plank[!] e. Too Cubed =(viii)


Pen tag on  [ ! ]. 
PoliticsNation: from Vlad to worse ?
 
too
two
Cubed?
Heir-archy of Image[!]

Countdown.

3
2.
1.
Count down ?[!]

Shilling / Schiller

What the FN~?
HeyDigger? knot/naut!


Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

Try Angle Nation

Noam Chom/sky:

Owl of Minerva /

Speculative Physics

(~)  Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.

(^)

Heuristic Concurrence and

My Respects to Those who Celebrate.

Try Angle Nation

RSN: cant or

I, J, K street?

Gender Clash
More Mon knee? TP

O W [?]  ...

(tout court [!])  6-25-14
Let alone Green's function 4yeah or phoyer, let alone faux-yer. Bin go.
Ruff FP:
orbit - Anachronism , Scratch That...
"many body" not exactly , hertz
Pars'n any:  A.  Thumbs/GOP and OWS , B. Anachronism , C. Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?, D. A Tail of Caution , E. I Told You So., F. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (re:legend - sc)

Mouse Course

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=mouse+corner
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=mice
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=mices
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/search?q=maze
Bottoms Up or Bubble Pop?
The Maze of Mace
Chump Change or stet the course?
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle?
June 2013 Footnotes Page
C3-PO?
To Be Arranged
Fair and Balanced...
Parallel (Or Not So Pair o' Lax) Channels
Health Care NOW
i.e. not to spell cOW or pi in the sky or o.u. but sometimes why...
Rat Races Van Mices?
Optimism
<
A Necessary Recovery Compromise  [...]
>
HELP NAVIGATION  [...]

OW

Under consider rata[?]

Anti-Progress[?]

In framing a heading I had a few missteps. 
Is it Positivism v. Popperism?
I would have 2 dig. 

[x, y, z?]

[Note: Facetious Time Stamp 2014]

Pyth Ag Or ean

breakdown or reduction: A. B. C. *

Notes from Al-Qaeda

We have met the enemy and he is us.

Truman Convention ?

*anachronistic link inserts
Where is the D?

[Note: Facetious Time Stamp 2014]

Randi Rhodes

Pre-Post ERism?

Post-Doc Terral?*

Randi Rhodes: Bin go!

*non sec quital[!] i.e. accidental?

[Note: Facetious Time Stamp 2014]

6-25-14  OW There was Rachell, there was Ed, but I we ge... where is Randi?

Literally

The catch may be in the fold.  The pun is in the journalism.  The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics.  The point is: what is a dimension?  Not to mention: what is a point?  A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective.  A point has no dimension.  Two points represent 1 dimension or a line.   Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions.  Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space.  But dimensions are one level below the point[!]

Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension.  But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).

(1-21-16)

1.):  Forward (Ironically), Para~graph Three!, Coordinary, Rough Philosophy, Order of Inserts.

2.): FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1),  Literally , Nadir, Dimentionalism(sic).

Then there is the Platonic Cave(or ideal). 
The tetrahedron is the most basic platonic form or ideal.  At least in our geometry, four points are the most that can be in perfect contact with each other.  Although a review of the perspectivism of Plato may be necessary.